VALU · sample dossier
Value Line Inc
58/100
OutdatedGenerated Sep 12, 2026 · 10:00 AM UTC · 55 days ago
This copy is frozen (Sep 12). Sign in to run the same work — filings, valuation, bull and bear, sources — on any US stock or ETF, in about 90 seconds.
Run a fresh dossierVALU
EquityValue Line Inc · XNAS
Decision context
Recommendation
Weighed down by weak Growth (11/100) and Value (52/100) scores.
A mixed picture — no strong reason to buy or sell right now.
AlphaDog Fair Value
Executive thesis & key metrics
Executive Investment Thesis
Value Line Inc is an investment research publisher with a market capitalization of $368.63M, trading at an EV/EBITDA multiple of 53.85 and a P/E ratio of 17.08. An avoid posture is justified by contracting top-line momentum with revenue growth of -4.5% YoY and a modest ROA of 1.7%, notwithstanding a negligible Debt/Equity ratio of 0.02. The primary risk is potential earnings quality distortion highlighted by a Beneish M-score of -1.66 indicating earnings manipulation risk, alongside an elevated EV/EBITDA of 53.85.
Key Metrics to Watch
What changed recently
No material changes found in the last 30 days.
Why this rating
Score 58 · Hold
Data through
OutdatedApr 30, 2026
Safety 100/100 — Debt/Equity 0.02.
Levels unavailable — AlphaDog quantitative valuation model did not produce an estimate from comps or DCF
Re-evaluate if
- Net margin falls below 51.7% (was 64.7%)
- EV/EBITDA contracts from 53.85 toward normalized levels below 20.0.
Trim / reconsider if
- ROA falls below 1.1% (was 1.7%)
- Revenue growth falls below -4.5%
- Debt-to-equity ratio increases above 0.02.
Dollar levels aren’t available for this run — the view above still stands.
A Calmer Look · Devil's Advocate
The unanimous bear consensus recommending an Avoid verdict fixates on an optical EV/EBITDA multiple of 53.85 while ignoring that Value Line trades at a modest P/E ratio of 17.1 with an extraordinary net margin of 64.7%.
May be overlooked
The severe disconnect between EV/EBITDA of 53.85 and P/E of 17.1 indicates non-operating earnings or investment portfolio distributions flow straight to the bottom line, rendering operational EBITDA an inadequate metric for corporate earnings.
The entire operational bear case relies on financial disclosures that are stale by over four months, with the most recent filing dated 2026-01-16 and quarterly performance anchored to 2026-04-30.
The consensus fails to evaluate whether an 82.0% gross margin and 64.7% net margin reflect persistent subscription pricing power capable of neutralizing the top-line contraction of -4.5% YoY.
Expectations look stretched
Bull reliance on price momentum metrics (14.0% 3-month return and trading above 50-day and 200-day moving averages) ignores extreme liquidity risks stemming from thin institutional ownership of just 0.02% between Neuberger Berman and BlackRock.
Uncritical reliance on trailing FCF per share of $0.28 to dismiss total profitability, ignoring potential timing shifts in annual subscription collections.
The assumption that CEO Howard A Brecher's minimal insider purchase of 200 shares ($6,778) on 2026-05-21 reflects meaningful management conviction or alignment.
Revenue growth YoY turns positive and exceeds -4.5%.
Revenue growth YoY turns positive and exceeds -4.5%.
Monitor These Triggers
3 Checkpoints · Next PrintRevenue growth YoY (current baseline: -4.5%)
Market context
Snapshot returns at report publication
1 month
+2.5%
3 months
+14.0%
6 months
+6.5%
1 year
+2.9%
At a Glance
A smaller company is on a steady trend at fair pricing.
Top Holders
Financial trajectory
Financial Performance
Go deeper
For learning and research only — not investment advice. AlphaDog doesn’t hold stocks and isn’t your financial advisor.
Run the next one yourself.
You just read a full VALU dossier — scored verdict, valuation, and both sides, with sources. Sign in to run that on a name you hold, on current filings. A free account includes 10 credits a week, 1 per fresh run.