UEC · sample dossier
Uranium Energy Corp.
48/100
OutdatedGenerated Sep 28, 2026 · 12:01 AM UTC · 39 days ago
This copy is frozen (Sep 28). Sign in to run the same work — filings, valuation, bull and bear, sources — on any US stock or ETF, in about 90 seconds.
Run a fresh dossierUEC
EquityUranium Energy Corp. · XASE
Decision context
Recommendation
Weighed down by weak Momentum (0/100) and Quality (27/100) scores.
A mixed picture — no strong reason to buy or sell right now.
AlphaDog Fair Value
Executive thesis & key metrics
Executive Investment Thesis
Uranium Energy Corp. is an energy exploration and extraction company with a market capitalization of $4.66B, trading at a price-to-earnings ratio of -42.77 and a price-to-book multiple of 3.27. The unremunerative profile reflects negative profitability with an ROA of -6.2% and a net margin of 0.0%, despite reporting top-line revenue growth of 29737.9% YoY and maintaining a zero-debt balance sheet with a Debt/Equity ratio of 0.00. The single biggest forensic risk is an extreme Beneish M-score of 210.7 signaling potential financial manipulation, compounded by 16.0% YoY shareholder dilution.
Key Metrics to Watch
What changed recently
No material changes found in the last 30 days.
Why this rating
Score 48 · Hold
Data through
OutdatedApr 30, 2026
Growth scores 100/100 — top-line expansion leads the profile.
Levels unavailable — AlphaDog quantitative valuation model did not produce an estimate from comps or DCF
Re-evaluate if
- Net margin falls below 0.0% (was 0.0%)
Trim / reconsider if
- ROA deteriorates below -6.2%
- Debt/Equity ratio increases above 0.00 to fund negative free cash flow per share.
Think of these dollars as a map of our value estimate for Hold — helpful context, not a reason to override the view.
A Calmer Look · Devil's Advocate
The consensus and dual-judge ruling unanimously favored the bear case based on trailing free cash flow of -$0.17 per share and an EV/EBITDA of -34.54, but this view creates a major blind spot by treating routine pre-production cash burn as imminent insolvency.
May be overlooked
The bear consensus equates negative operational cash flow (-$0.17 FCF/share) with existential solvency failure, ignoring that a 0.00 Debt/Equity ratio and an Altman Z-score of 23.89 protect UEC from debt servicing defaults.
The adversarial debate relies on stale regulatory filings older than 90 days (2026-03-23 through 2026-06-09 relative to 2026-09-28), leaving current cash burn rates and inventory marks unverified against the latest 2026-07-23 Form 8-K.
Neither side evaluates whether long-cycle utility procurement terms can structurally reverse an ROA of -6.2% without triggering secondary dilution beyond the current 16.0% YoY share count expansion.
Expectations look stretched
Bull arguments extrapolate 29737.9% YoY top-line revenue growth as sustained operational scaling despite reported gross margin and net margin both resting at 0.0%.
Sustaining a $4.66B market cap alongside a Price/Book of 3.3 reflects unjustified multiple inflation for an asset operating at an EV/EBITDA of -34.54.
Bullish reliance on inventory monetization ignores forensic red flags signaled by a Beneish M-score of 210.7 and a Piotroski F-score of 4/9.
Gross margin rises above 0.0% with positive free cash flow per share exceeding $-0.17.
Gross margin rises above 0.0% with positive free cash flow per share exceeding $-0.17.
Market context
Snapshot returns at report publication
1 month
-28.3%
3 months
-12.9%
6 months
-27.9%
1 year
-31.2%
At a Glance
A mid-sized company is in a pullback at unprofitable earnings.
Top Holders
Financial trajectory
Financial Performance
Go deeper
For learning and research only — not investment advice. AlphaDog doesn’t hold stocks and isn’t your financial advisor.
Run the next one yourself.
You just read a full UEC dossier — scored verdict, valuation, and both sides, with sources. Sign in to run that on a name you hold, on current filings. A free account includes 10 credits a week, 1 per fresh run.